Insights
·
Jun 1, 2023
·
5 min
Talk data to me: our map legend, Alexey Tarutin, answers your top 10 GIS questions.
Alexey dives into the world of GIS data and answers your most commonly asked questions
Read article
Kicking off in April 2025, the eighth Asset Management Period (AMP8) will define England and Wales’ water sector’s priorities and spending until 2030. Managed by Ofwat, these five-year cycles guide water companies’ investments to meet regulatory, environmental, and operational objectives. With a proposed £96 billion investment, nearly double that of AMP7, AMP8 is set to focus on reducing leakage, tackling climate change, improving water supply resilience, and protecting the environment.
The scale of these ambitions reflects the urgency to address ageing infrastructure, increase sustainability, and mitigate risks tied to supply interruptions and fines. But with such an enormous opportunity comes an equally huge challenge: how can water companies balance the complexity of these priorities while ensuring efficient delivery?
Water pipeline projects typically involve around 12 months of optioneering, 6–8 months of detailed design, and a 2-year construction period. Throughout these phases, numerous design iterations are needed to address objections or incorporate new data—whether to avoid ecological habitats or mitigate engineering challenges like major highway or railway crossings. Traditionally, teams rely on basic GIS tools, printed maps, static reports, and lengthy email chains to share route options and gather feedback. Each iteration often involves manually fine-tuning alignments to address emerging constraints, resulting in a 1–2-month time lag per revision.
These manual, time-intensive processes carry significant risks: projects face up to £3 million in regulatory penalties for every year they are delayed, while escalating Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) land acquisition costs continue to strain budgets.
Under the pressures of AMP8, these traditional approaches—disconnected teams using siloed tools and relying on slow, static workflows—are no longer sustainable. With £96 billion in investment at stake, inefficiencies at any stage of the project can lead to substantial financial and reputational consequences.
To meet AMP8’s challenges, many water companies are turning to AI-powered tools to accelerate and de-risk the planning and delivery of pipeline infrastructure projects. Tools that enable teams to rapidly generate and evaluate routes, factoring in cost, environmental impact, elevation, and technical feasibility, are helping streamline workflows and minimising delays typically caused by manual processes and extended feedback cycles.
Collaborative, real-time adjustment tools also help support teams consider new constraints as they emerge—such as new development areas or high-cost crossings—saving valuable time and allowing teams to focus on critical tasks like field studies and design refinement to keep projects on schedule.
This intelligent automation isn’t just about saving time, but about improving the justification of the decisions made. By visualising and reporting on complex constraints earlier in the design process, teams can better identify the most feasible and cost-effective solutions. This early insight allows them to move into field studies with confidence ensure the delivery of sustainable, compliant, and well-justified infrastructure projects.
Despite posing significant challenges, AMP8 offers a pivotal opportunity to redefine how water infrastructure projects are planned and delivered. The stakes are high: rising costs, stricter regulations, and the unrelenting pressure to deliver faster without compromising on quality.
By adopting AI-powered development tools like Optioneer, water companies can accelerate project delivery, save millions in costs, and ensure compliance with stringent environmental and engineering standards. The question isn’t whether to embrace innovation—but whether you can afford not to.